<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ant for Scala!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vikasrao.wordpress.com/2009/06/20/ant-for-scala/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vikasrao.wordpress.com/2009/06/20/ant-for-scala/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:12:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ilan berci</title>
		<link>http://vikasrao.wordpress.com/2009/06/20/ant-for-scala/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>ilan berci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vikasrao.wordpress.com/?p=74#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Or you could alternatively just port over Rake/Capistrano from Ruby (if it hasn&#039;t been done already) which would fit in very nicely with the Scala tools as Scala can be written as a script (and with it&#039;s type inference, it would be relatively comparable to the ruby scripts), and then you would have something much more configurable, readable, and simpler than ant.. 

Nothing is better at building Scala apps than Scala.. 

Ant is so last century.. time to move to a better build utility..  If you reply and tell me that your build team is not comfortable in dealing with DSLs, I will agree that you are probably right but I bet they are far less comfortable in dealing with heavy verbose XML scripts.  :)

ilan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or you could alternatively just port over Rake/Capistrano from Ruby (if it hasn&#8217;t been done already) which would fit in very nicely with the Scala tools as Scala can be written as a script (and with it&#8217;s type inference, it would be relatively comparable to the ruby scripts), and then you would have something much more configurable, readable, and simpler than ant.. </p>
<p>Nothing is better at building Scala apps than Scala.. </p>
<p>Ant is so last century.. time to move to a better build utility..  If you reply and tell me that your build team is not comfortable in dealing with DSLs, I will agree that you are probably right but I bet they are far less comfortable in dealing with heavy verbose XML scripts.  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>ilan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Session and Entity Beans with Scala! &#171; Random Ramblings!</title>
		<link>http://vikasrao.wordpress.com/2009/06/20/ant-for-scala/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Session and Entity Beans with Scala! &#171; Random Ramblings!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vikasrao.wordpress.com/?p=74#comment-48</guid>
		<description>[...] keep the process of deploying the war to glassfish simple and reliable, I wrote an ant script for it instead of relying on Eclipse to do the job for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] keep the process of deploying the war to glassfish simple and reliable, I wrote an ant script for it instead of relying on Eclipse to do the job for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
